Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 12:14:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> So how do we do this?
> Is there any sneaky way in which we can modify the kernel so that this new
> code gets exercised more?  Obviously, tossing init into some default
> system-wide container would be a start.  But I wonder if we can be
> sneakier - for example, create a new container on each setuid(), toss the
> task into that.  Or something along those lines?

How about a container for each thread group, pgrp, session, and user?


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
    • From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] alsa: fix comparison of unsigned < 0
• Next by Date: Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]