Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers

On Tue, 29 May 2007 06:01:04 -0700 [email protected] wrote:

> This is an update to my multi-hierarchy multi-subsystem generic
> process containers patch.
> 
> ...
> 
> Still TODO:
> 
> ...
>
> - lots more testing
> 

So how do we do this?

Is there any sneaky way in which we can modify the kernel so that this new
code gets exercised more?  Obviously, tossing init into some default
system-wide container would be a start.  But I wonder if we can be
sneakier - for example, create a new container on each setuid(), toss the
task into that.  Or something along those lines?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
    • From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
    • From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] security: revalidate rw permissions for sys_splice and sys_vmsplice
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Containers(V10): Basic container framework
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 10/10] Containers(V10): Support for automatic userspace release agents
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]