Dave Jones wrote:
The patch content looks ok to me, Daniel, ack?
Works for me, thanks. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Joshua Hoblitt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Prakash Punnoor <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: "Duane Griffin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Joshua Hoblitt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Ed Sweetman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Joshua Hoblitt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6
- Next by Date: [alpha] cleanup in bitops.h
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- Next by thread: Oops and Panics in 2.6.21.1, 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.19.2
- Index(es):
 |