Re: [PATCH] add a trivial patch style checker

On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:23:45AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Possible further checks that might make sense:
> - panic() anywhere in drivers/* 

A driver should be allowed to panic. E.g. if it detects that due to a
firmware or driver bug memory corruption happened. IMHO the best thing
to do then is panic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] add a trivial patch style checker
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] add a trivial patch style checker
    • From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] add a trivial patch style checker
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Seeding /dev/random not working
• Next by Date: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] add a trivial patch style checker II
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] add a trivial patch style checker
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]