Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 1/3] PM: Hibernation and suspend notifiers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 27 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> 
> Make it possible to register hibernation and suspend notifiers, so that
> subsystems can perform hibernation-related or suspend-related operations that
> should not be carried out by device drivers' .suspend() and .resume() routines.

> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(pm_notifier_lock);
> +
> +static RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(pm_chain);

Is there any particular reason you chose to use a RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD 
with an explicit mutex instead of using a BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD?

Alan Stern

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux