Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 5

On 5/28/07, Michael-Luke Jones <[email protected]> wrote:

No, LZO as a visible option makes no practical sense. Why would
anyone want to build LZO into a kernel when there are no in-kernel
users of the code?

Agreed. It should be a auto-selected hidden config option.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 5
    • From: "Nitin Gupta" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 5
    • From: Michael-Luke Jones <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 5
    • From: "Nitin Gupta" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 5
    • From: Michael-Luke Jones <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] /proc/*/environ: wrong placing of ptrace_may_attach() check
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Preserve the dirty bit in init_page_buffers
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 5
• Next by thread: [RFC PATCH]Multi-threaded Initcall with dependence support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]