On 28 May 2007, at 13:09, Nitin Gupta wrote:
This means:
1) Options in lib/Kconfig hidden (selectable by drivers as required)
LZO as hidden option has no practical sense. Although LZO should be
auto-selected when some dependent project is selected (e.g. reieser4)
- there should be separate patch for this. Mixing such changes with
'core' LZO patch will just add side noise.
No, LZO as a visible option makes no practical sense. Why would
anyone want to build LZO into a kernel when there are no in-kernel
users of the code?
In fact, all of the library code should probably go this way...
Michael-Luke Jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
