Re: [PATCH} x86_64 PM_TRACE support.

[Julian Sikorski <belegdol@gmail.com>]

Pavel Machek pisze:
> Hi!
> 
>> As promised I took another look at the patch and at what Randy had
>> prepared to fix the IA64 compilation error. I did some more work on it,
>> and believe that the following is the tidiest correct solution I can
>> come up with. It differs from the version that caused the compilation
>> error primarily in that:
>>
>> * the #include <asm/resume-trace.h> is inside the #ifdef 
>>   CONFIG_PM_TRACE.
>> * now-unnecessary protection for multiple #includes and ifdef testing of
>>   CONFIG_PM_TRACE in the asm code were removed.
>> * do-nothing definitions for !PM_TRACE restored to
>>   include/linux/resume-trace.h.
>>
>> We're therefore depending upon kernel/power/Kconfig having the right
>> depends condition. As far as I can see, IA64 doesn't define CONFIG_X86.
>> Is that correct, or do we need to have (X86 && !IA64)?
> 
> ia64? did you mean x86-64?
> 
> Otherwise looks ok to me.
> 
IIRC enabling pm_trace on x86_64 was breaking compilation on ia64, so I
think Nigel meant the latter.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/