Hi all. As promised I took another look at the patch and at what Randy had prepared to fix the IA64 compilation error. I did some more work on it, and believe that the following is the tidiest correct solution I can come up with. It differs from the version that caused the compilation error primarily in that: * the #include <asm/resume-trace.h> is inside the #ifdef CONFIG_PM_TRACE. * now-unnecessary protection for multiple #includes and ifdef testing of CONFIG_PM_TRACE in the asm code were removed. * do-nothing definitions for !PM_TRACE restored to include/linux/resume-trace.h. We're therefore depending upon kernel/power/Kconfig having the right depends condition. As far as I can see, IA64 doesn't define CONFIG_X86. Is that correct, or do we need to have (X86 && !IA64)? Randy, since this is substantially different to the work you did, I haven't added your signed-off-by as we previously discussed. Signed-off-by: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]> CC: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> CC: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 7 +++++++ drivers/base/power/trace.c | 5 ++++- include/asm-i386/resume-trace.h | 13 +++++++++++++ include/asm-x86_64/resume-trace.h | 13 +++++++++++++ include/linux/resume-trace.h | 19 +++++-------------- kernel/power/Kconfig | 2 +- 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff -ruNp 200.patch-old/arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S 200.patch-new/arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S --- 200.patch-old/arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S 2007-05-26 14:18:22.000000000 +1000 +++ 200.patch-new/arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S 2007-05-26 14:23:52.000000000 +1000 @@ -52,6 +52,13 @@ SECTIONS RODATA + . = ALIGN(4); + .tracedata : AT(ADDR(.tracedata) - LOAD_OFFSET) { + __tracedata_start = .; + *(.tracedata) + __tracedata_end = .; + } + . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); /* Align data segment to page size boundary */ /* Data */ .data : AT(ADDR(.data) - LOAD_OFFSET) { diff -ruNp 200.patch-old/drivers/base/power/trace.c 200.patch-new/drivers/base/power/trace.c --- 200.patch-old/drivers/base/power/trace.c 2007-05-26 14:18:23.000000000 +1000 +++ 200.patch-new/drivers/base/power/trace.c 2007-05-26 14:23:52.000000000 +1000 @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ void set_trace_device(struct device *dev { dev_hash_value = hash_string(DEVSEED, dev->bus_id, DEVHASH); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_trace_device); /* * We could just take the "tracedata" index into the .tracedata @@ -162,6 +163,7 @@ void generate_resume_trace(void *traceda file_hash_value = hash_string(lineno, file, FILEHASH); set_magic_time(user_hash_value, file_hash_value, dev_hash_value); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL(generate_resume_trace); extern char __tracedata_start, __tracedata_end; static int show_file_hash(unsigned int value) @@ -170,7 +172,8 @@ static int show_file_hash(unsigned int v char *tracedata; match = 0; - for (tracedata = &__tracedata_start ; tracedata < &__tracedata_end ; tracedata += 6) { + for (tracedata = &__tracedata_start ; tracedata < &__tracedata_end ; + tracedata += 2 + sizeof(unsigned long)) { unsigned short lineno = *(unsigned short *)tracedata; const char *file = *(const char **)(tracedata + 2); unsigned int hash = hash_string(lineno, file, FILEHASH); diff -ruNp 200.patch-old/include/asm-i386/resume-trace.h 200.patch-new/include/asm-i386/resume-trace.h --- 200.patch-old/include/asm-i386/resume-trace.h 1970-01-01 10:00:00.000000000 +1000 +++ 200.patch-new/include/asm-i386/resume-trace.h 2007-05-26 16:07:31.000000000 +1000 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +#define TRACE_RESUME(user) do { \ + if (pm_trace_enabled) { \ + void *tracedata; \ + asm volatile("movl $1f,%0\n" \ + ".section .tracedata,\"a\"\n" \ + "1:\t.word %c1\n" \ + "\t.long %c2\n" \ + ".previous" \ + :"=r" (tracedata) \ + : "i" (__LINE__), "i" (__FILE__)); \ + generate_resume_trace(tracedata, user); \ + } \ +} while (0) diff -ruNp 200.patch-old/include/asm-x86_64/resume-trace.h 200.patch-new/include/asm-x86_64/resume-trace.h --- 200.patch-old/include/asm-x86_64/resume-trace.h 1970-01-01 10:00:00.000000000 +1000 +++ 200.patch-new/include/asm-x86_64/resume-trace.h 2007-05-26 16:07:27.000000000 +1000 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +#define TRACE_RESUME(user) do { \ + if (pm_trace_enabled) { \ + void *tracedata; \ + asm volatile("movq $1f,%0\n" \ + ".section .tracedata,\"a\"\n" \ + "1:\t.word %c1\n" \ + "\t.quad %c2\n" \ + ".previous" \ + :"=r" (tracedata) \ + : "i" (__LINE__), "i" (__FILE__)); \ + generate_resume_trace(tracedata, user); \ + } \ +} while (0) diff -ruNp 200.patch-old/include/linux/resume-trace.h 200.patch-new/include/linux/resume-trace.h --- 200.patch-old/include/linux/resume-trace.h 2007-05-26 14:18:47.000000000 +1000 +++ 200.patch-new/include/linux/resume-trace.h 2007-05-26 16:17:43.000000000 +1000 @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ #define RESUME_TRACE_H #ifdef CONFIG_PM_TRACE +#include <asm/resume-trace.h> extern int pm_trace_enabled; @@ -9,20 +10,10 @@ struct device; extern void set_trace_device(struct device *); extern void generate_resume_trace(void *tracedata, unsigned int user); -#define TRACE_DEVICE(dev) set_trace_device(dev) -#define TRACE_RESUME(user) do { \ - if (pm_trace_enabled) { \ - void *tracedata; \ - asm volatile("movl $1f,%0\n" \ - ".section .tracedata,\"a\"\n" \ - "1:\t.word %c1\n" \ - "\t.long %c2\n" \ - ".previous" \ - :"=r" (tracedata) \ - : "i" (__LINE__), "i" (__FILE__)); \ - generate_resume_trace(tracedata, user); \ - } \ -} while (0) +#define TRACE_DEVICE(dev) do { \ + if (pm_trace_enabled) \ + set_trace_device(dev); \ + } while(0) #else diff -ruNp 200.patch-old/kernel/power/Kconfig 200.patch-new/kernel/power/Kconfig --- 200.patch-old/kernel/power/Kconfig 2007-05-26 14:18:48.000000000 +1000 +++ 200.patch-new/kernel/power/Kconfig 2007-05-26 14:23:52.000000000 +1000 @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ config DISABLE_CONSOLE_SUSPEND config PM_TRACE bool "Suspend/resume event tracing" - depends on PM && PM_DEBUG && X86_32 && EXPERIMENTAL + depends on PM && PM_DEBUG && X86 && EXPERIMENTAL default n ---help--- This enables some cheesy code to save the last PM event point in the
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH} x86_64 PM_TRACE support.
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH} x86_64 PM_TRACE support.
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH} x86_64 PM_TRACE support.
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH} x86_64 PM_TRACE support.
- Prev by Date: Re: e1000 in 2.6.21.2 and even older, like 2.6.13: eth0 does not exist but eth1 does
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1: evm BUG when reading sysfs file
- Previous by thread: reg: modules make in Ubuntu
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH} x86_64 PM_TRACE support.
- Index(es):