On May 24, 2007, at 10:51 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
Do we have a feel for how much performace we're losing on those
systems which _could_ do MSI, but which will end up defaulting
to not using it?
At least on 10GB ethernet it is a significant difference; you usually
cannot go anywhere near line speed without MSI
I suspect it is visible on high performance / multiple GB NICs too.
Why would that be? As the packet rate goes up and NAPI polling kicks
in, wouldn't MSI make less and less difference?
I like the fact that MSI gives us finer control over CPU affinity
than many INTx implementations, but that's a different issue.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
