Re: [PATCH 1/2] msi: Invert the sense of the MSI enables.

> Do we have a feel for how much performace we're losing on those 
> systems which _could_ do MSI, but which will end up defaulting
> to not using it?

At least on 10GB ethernet it is a significant difference; you usually
cannot go anywhere near line speed without MSI

I suspect it is visible on high performance / multiple GB NICs too.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] msi: Invert the sense of the MSI enables.
  - From: Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] msi: Invert the sense of the MSI enables.
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] msi: Invert the sense of the MSI enables.
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
Next by Date: Re: [RFC 2/5] inode reservation v0.1 (ext4 kernel patch)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] msi: Invert the sense of the MSI enables.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] msi: Invert the sense of the MSI enables.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]