* Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's done slightly differently now due to conflicting earlier changes,
> but the end result should be about what you intended. You're also
> still credited in the cleanup patch of course.
you totally misunderstood me. My problem isnt credit. I've got enough
credit for a lifetime ;-) I'd be equally upset if this happened with
someone else's patches (in fact i'd be _more_ upset about it, because
then i'd also be worried about us losing a contributor).
My problem is that (and this might just be an issue of communication)
you often appear as treating the x86_64 code as 'your code' instead of
treating it as 'our code'. Dropping part of my patch, not even telling
whether you took the patches or not, not reacting to patches in a
positive way are all external signs of that.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
