Ingo Molnar wrote: > i was adding WARN_ON()s that werent true 'warnings' but 'bugs'. IME, the trace dump in the kernel log looks scary enough to be eventually reported, even if prefixed with "WARNING:". -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=-= ==--= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions v2
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions v2
- References:
- Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions v2
- From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>
- Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions v2
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions v2
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions v2
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions v2
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions v2
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions v2
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix sched_clock()
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix sched_clock()
- Previous by thread: Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions v2
- Next by thread: Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions v2
- Index(es):
 |