On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:08:27AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Andi, Andrew, do you remember why we disabled TSCs on NUMAQ? It was
> slightly async between CPUs, right? In that case we should try the patch
> below.
I remember. It was far beyond "slightly async;" they would drift
minutes apart during reasonable amounts of uptime, though it would take
at least several days to drift so far (I don't recall how long it took).
TSC synchronization is uniformly impossible on NUMA-Q. Bootlogs showing
the results of the attempts are still extant. They shouldn't end up too
far apart right after booting, but I don't have even ballpark estimates.
I'd hazard a guess of a few seconds.
NUMA-Q's also supported mixed CPU models in hardware, though that's
not really expected to be handled by Linux. I suspect DYNIX/ptx would
be used by anyone interested in that.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
