On Fri, 25 May 2007 07:10:38 +0000 "young dave" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I'm very sorry, andrew, you are right. > I directly modified the source and forgot remove the line ni->name[i] = 0; > Phew ;) Thanks for checking. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: "young dave" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: "young dave" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: "young dave" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: "young dave" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: "young dave" <[email protected]>
- 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- Prev by Date: Re: filesystem benchmarking fun
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- Next by thread: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups
- Index(es):