Yes, I'm sure. but the patch in top post of mine works, the diffrence is using kzalloc and remove the "ni->name[i] = 0;" line. Regards dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- References:
- 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: "young dave" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: "young dave" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: "young dave" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Chaining sg lists for big IO commands v5
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- Index(es):