On Fri, 25 May 2007, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Does that mean you never ever power off your laptop (assuming you have > one), and the battery never runs out? Surely you must power it off > completely sometimes? So? The bootup isn't that much worse than a disk suspend/resume, and it's reliable. And actually, I don't use laptops much. I use mostly desktops, and STR works fine on at least some of them. In contrast, doing some suspend-to-disk thing would just be insane and idiotic. If I have to wait for half a minute and have a slow system even after that because my git trees aren't in the cache, I really might as well just shut them off. In contrast, STR means they are quiet and don't waste energy when I don't use them, but they're instantly available when I care. HUGE difference. I really think suspend-to-disk is just a total waste of my time. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- References:
- Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Romano Giannetti <romanol@upcomillas.es>
- Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
- Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Prev by Date: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Next by Date: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 NTFS & SLUB related fix
- Previous by thread: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Next by thread: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Index(es):
![]() |