On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 07:23 +0200, Michael Gerdau wrote: > For me the huge difference you have for sd to the others increases the > likelyhood the glxgears benchmark does not measure scheduling of graphic > but something else. I think some people forget that X11 has its own scheduler for graphics operations. Xav - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- From: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
- Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- References:
- Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- From: Michael Gerdau <[email protected]>
- Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: swap prefetch improvements
- Next by Date: RE: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 - s390 vs. md
- Previous by thread: Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- Next by thread: Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- Index(es):
 |