Re: [PATCH -rt] ARM TLB flush fix: don't forget to re-enable preemption

On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 16:41 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
 
> 
> Individually, yes.  But the point of the preempt_disable/enable is to
> make the whole sequence atomic.

I was under the impression that only one of those mcr lines is called
per board type, the rest just compile away?

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH -rt] ARM TLB flush fix: don't forget to re-enable preemption
  - From: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -rt] ARM TLB flush fix: don't forget to re-enable preemption
  - From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -rt] ARM TLB flush fix: don't forget to re-enable preemption
  - From: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH -rt] Resolve -rt OMAP conflicts
Next by Date: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -rt] ARM TLB flush fix: don't forget to re-enable preemption
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -rt] ARM TLB flush fix: don't forget to re-enable preemption
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]