On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 16:25 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 16:01 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > Add a preempt_enable() to flush_tlb_kernel_page() since -rt4 patch
> > adds a preempt_disable but no preempt_enable().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> > ---
> > include/asm-arm/tlbflush.h | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.21/include/asm-arm/tlbflush.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.21.orig/include/asm-arm/tlbflush.h
> > +++ linux-2.6.21/include/asm-arm/tlbflush.h
> > @@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ static inline void local_flush_tlb_kerne
> > asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c8, c6, 1" : : "r" (kaddr) : "cc");
> > if (tlb_flag(TLB_V6_I_PAGE))
> > asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c8, c5, 1" : : "r" (kaddr) : "cc");
>
> Aren't these mcr operations atomic?
>
Individually, yes. But the point of the preempt_disable/enable is to
make the whole sequence atomic.
Kevin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
