Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle

Greg KH wrote:

Well, SuSE handles this just fine, but I do notice that RHEL 5 disables
the new_id stuff entirely, so I can see why you might get this
impression :)

I looked at distros other than those produced by my employer.

Apparently you did not.

This is not how we best serve Linux users.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] local_softirq_pending storm
• Next by Date: Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image
• Previous by thread: Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
• Next by thread: Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]