Greg KH wrote:
Well, SuSE handles this just fine, but I do notice that RHEL 5 disables the new_id stuff entirely, so I can see why you might get this impression :)
I looked at distros other than those produced by my employer. Apparently you did not. This is not how we best serve Linux users. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
- From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
- References:
- [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
- Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
- From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
- From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
- Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
- From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
- Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] local_softirq_pending storm
- Next by Date: Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image
- Previous by thread: Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
- Next by thread: Re: [stable] Wanted: Allow adding new device IDs during the -stable cycle
- Index(es):
 |