It is a quite sensible idea. The userspace X server SHOULD be running under a non-root user, with appropriate fine-grained privs granted to it. "I need root to do graphics" is a myopic, antiquated view of the world.
Did I say the X server? There are policy decisions that are root only also authorisation of processes to render etc.. I'm not sure we can punt all that in-kernel. Dave.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
- References:
- [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
- From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
- From: "Jon Smirl" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
- From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
- From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
- From: "Jon Smirl" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
- From: "Dave Airlie" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 13/15] x86-64: Calgary - tabify and trim trailing whitespace
- Next by Date: Re: Dumping the checksums in a module
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] enhancing the kernel's graphics subsystem
- Index(es):