Re: [stable] [PATCH] Ignore bogus ACPI info for offline CPUs

* Thomas Gleixner ([email protected]) wrote:
> The irq 9 issue is a separate problem and only surfaces on some boxen,
> but it's not related to this patch. It's related to maxcpus=1 as well.

Thanks for confirming, just was double checking the two issues were
indeed separate.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Ignore bogus ACPI info for offline CPUs
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Ignore bogus ACPI info for offline CPUs
    • From: Darren Hart <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] [PATCH] Ignore bogus ACPI info for offline CPUs
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] [PATCH] Ignore bogus ACPI info for offline CPUs
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [stable] [PATCH] Ignore bogus ACPI info for offline CPUs
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_prarm instead of console_initcall
• Previous by thread: Re: [stable] [PATCH] Ignore bogus ACPI info for offline CPUs
• Next by thread: Re: [stable] [PATCH] Ignore bogus ACPI info for offline CPUs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]