On Monday 21 May 2007 10:08:15 Chris Wright wrote:
> * Darren Hart ([email protected]) wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 May 2007 07:22:50 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Booting a SMP kernel with maxcpus=1 on a SMP system leads to a hard
> > > hang, because ACPI ignores the maxcpus setting and sends timer
> > > broadcast info for the offline CPUs. This results in a stuck for ever
> > > call to smp_call_function_single() on an offline CPU.
> > >
> > > Ignore the bogus information and print a kernel error to remind ACPI
> > > folks to fix it.
> > >
> > > Affects 2.6.21 / 2.6.22-rc
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> >
> > When I first booted with this patch I received the following in a loop:
> >
> > irq 9: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
>
> What happens when booting w/out this patch? Don't want to add known
> regression to -stable.
The system will boot w/o acpi=noirq with and without this patch if maxcpus is
not specified. If maxcpus is specified without the patch, the system locks
up as Thomas described. If maxcpus is specified with the patch, then
acpi=noirq is required to boot - but it will boot. This does not introduce a
regression IMO.
--Darren
>
> thanks,
> -chris
--
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Realtime Linux Team
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
