Re: [PATCH 20/32] Blackfin arch: dma_memcpy borken for > 64K

["Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>]

Hi Bryan,

On 5/21/07, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> wrote:
> -void *dma_memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t size)
> +void *_dma_memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t size)

Minor nitpick: the established naming convention is two underscores, not one.

> +void *dma_memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t size)
> +{
> +       size_t bulk;
> +       size_t rest;
> +       void * addr;
> +
> +       bulk = (size >> 16) << 16;

I assume this is significantly faster on your architecture than:

  bulk = size & ~0xFFFFUL;

which is more readable?

> +       rest = size - bulk;
> +       if (bulk)
> +               _dma_memcpy(dest, src, bulk);
> +       addr = _dma_memcpy(dest+bulk, src+bulk, rest);
> +       return addr;

Does this work for 128K and up? Why?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/