Re: [PATCH 1/2] sysfs: fix condition check in sysfs_drop_dentry()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:52:53PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The condition check doesn't make much sense as it basically always
> succeeds.  This causes NULL dereferencing on certain cases.  It seems
> that parentheses are put in the wrong place.  Fix it.
> 
> DON'T APPLY JUST YET
> ---
> 
> Maneesh, is this correct?
> 
Yes.

>  fs/sysfs/inode.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: work/fs/sysfs/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/fs/sysfs/inode.c
> +++ work/fs/sysfs/inode.c
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ void sysfs_drop_dentry(struct sysfs_dire
>  	if (dentry) {
>  		spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
>  		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
> -		if (!(d_unhashed(dentry) && dentry->d_inode)) {
> +		if (!d_unhashed(dentry) && dentry->d_inode) {
>  			inode = dentry->d_inode;
>  			spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
>  			__iget(inode);


Ack'ed

Thanks
Maneesh

-- 
Maneesh Soni
Linux Technology Center,
IBM India Systems and Technology Lab, 
Bangalore, India
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux