On Wed, 16 May 2007 17:40:53 +0200 Tejun Heo <[email protected]> wrote: > I see. I thought there was different approach on fixing the problem. > I'll try to backport the synchronization fix but am afraid it can be too > risky for -stable. If it seems too risky, I'll send a patch to disable > reclamation. OK. Sad. Maybe we add /proc/sys/fs/i-have-lots-of-disks-and-dont-mind-if-it-oopses to enable the old behaviour. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oops and Panics in 2.6.21.1, 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.19.2
- From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH -stable] sysfs: disable reclamation by default
- From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops and Panics in 2.6.21.1, 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.19.2
- References:
- Oops and Panics in 2.6.21.1, 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.19.2
- From: Clemens Schwaighofer <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops and Panics in 2.6.21.1, 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.19.2
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops and Panics in 2.6.21.1, 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.19.2
- From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops and Panics in 2.6.21.1, 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.19.2
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Oops and Panics in 2.6.21.1, 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.19.2
- From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Oops and Panics in 2.6.21.1, 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.19.2
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: make better section mismatch reports on i386 and mips
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: Oops and Panics in 2.6.21.1, 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.19.2
- Next by thread: [PATCH -stable] sysfs: disable reclamation by default
- Index(es):
 |