Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II

On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 01:47:44PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
 > On Saturday 19 May 2007 08:02, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 07:53:16AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
 > >  > This preserves the 6 <= model  <= 9 logic of the C code; this means
 > >  > if VIA ever brings out model >= 10 it hopefully sets this bit by
 > >  > default. Dave, do you have any information to the contrary?
 > >
 > > Model 10 (Esther) has the same feature.
 > 
 > Hmm nasty. Is it safe to assume that all VIA family == 6 will have that
 > MSR with the bit doing the same?

I would think so yes.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64
  - From: Christian <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc1 regression: tifm prevents suspending [was: Re: [2.6.22-rc1-mm1] vaio laptop (SZ72B) immediately resumes after STR]
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II
Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II
Next by thread: Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]