Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II

On Saturday 19 May 2007 08:02, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 07:53:16AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>  > This preserves the 6 <= model  <= 9 logic of the C code; this means
>  > if VIA ever brings out model >= 10 it hopefully sets this bit by
>  > default. Dave, do you have any information to the contrary?
>
> Model 10 (Esther) has the same feature.

Hmm nasty. Is it safe to assume that all VIA family == 6 will have that
MSR with the bit doing the same?

Perhaps we need some Centaur contact for guidance on this. Do you
have a current one? 

-Andi (who failed even to find current datasheets on the VIA website) 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

References:
- 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64
  - From: Christian <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc2: regression: STD fails with pci_device_suspend(): usb_hcd_pci_suspend+0x0/0x160 [usbcore]() returns -16
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: new exception handling (hotplug, NCQ framework)
Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II
Next by thread: Re: 2.6.22-rc1 does not boot on VIA C3_2 cause of X86_CMPXCHG64 II
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]