On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 21:55 +0200, matthieu castet wrote: > > Are you suggesting that this has changed since I did my testing? > > > Which version of gcc did you try ? It was a while ago -- probably 3.2 or something like that. I think it might even predate the summary support. When I get home I'll take another look. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: Matthieu CASTET <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: matthieu castet <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver
- Next by Date: [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_prarm instead of console_initcall
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- Index(es):
 |