On May 17 2007 21:00, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> > > Opinions?
>> >
>> > Why would we need another btree, when there is lib/rbtree.c? Or does
>> > yours do something fundamentally different?
>>
>> It is not red-black tree, it is b+ tree.
>
> It might be better to use the prefix "bptree" to help prevent confusion. A
> quick google search on "bp-tree" reveals only the perl B+-tree module
> "Tree::BPTree", a U-Maryland Java CS project on B+-trees, and a news article
> about a "BP tree-top protest".
BP heh.. How about "struct bplustree"?
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
