On May 16 2007 02:06, Jörn Engel wrote:
>
>> > +/* memtree.c */
>> > +void btree_init(struct btree_head *head);
>> > +void *btree_lookup(struct btree_head *head, long val);
>> > +int btree_insert(struct btree_head *head, long val, void *ptr);
>> > +int btree_remove(struct btree_head *head, long val);
>>
>> These names are too generic. If we later add a btree library: blam.
>
>My plan was to move this code to lib/ sooner or later. If you consider
>it useful in its current state, I can do it immediatly. And if someone
>else merged a superior btree library I'd happily remove mine and use the
>new one instead.
>
>Opinions?
Why would we need another btree, when there is lib/rbtree.c?
Or does yours do something fundamentally different?
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
