On 5/17/07, Al Viro <[email protected]> wrote:
Ahem... So what does
x |= y;
turns into with that approach?
Do we want to do such kind of operations on endian-annotated data? I'd imagine you want to convert ot host-endianess first anyway. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- References:
- [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- Prev by Date: Re: UML doesn't compile in 2.6.21
- Next by Date: patch cpufreq-powernow-k7-fix-mhz-rounding-issue-with-perflib.patch queued to 2.6.21-stable tree
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ubi: kill homegrown endian macros
- Index(es):
 |