* Török Edvin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/17/07, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >note: you ran it on a dual-core system and the SMP load-balancer needs
> >time to gain precision in the non-RT test - so i'd suggest to test it
> >much longer than 10 seconds: 300 seconds at least.
>
> Thanks, running for 300 seconds shows only a 2% error. Even running a
> I/O workload while running the massive_intr test keeps the same error.
hey, cool! Also try -v13 - it should be even more tighter.
> BTW, the system is more 'responsive'. For example starting
> applications while running the tests, switching windows, moving
> windows is much "smoother" than on default scheduler.
yeah :)
> [while true;do cp /usr/portage/distfiles/linux-2.6.21.tar.bz2 . &&
> sync && rm linux-2.6.21.tar.bz2 && sync; done]
>
> ./massiv_new 9 300
> 020860 00017782
> 020858 00017774
>
> RT JOB:020865 00003785
>
> 020859 00017048
> 020862 00017387
> 020855 00017494
> 020861 00017245
> 020863 00017492
> 020864 00017122
looks pretty good!
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
