* Török Edvin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there something I am doing wrong, or is the precision decrease
> expected, when running real-time tasks too?
yeah: real-time tasks are ueber-tasks that just get all CPU time
immediately. I guess we could make SCHED_RR be covered by CFS accounting
eventually.
> Very precise indeed, the default scheduler produces lots of different
> timings there.
note: you ran it on a dual-core system and the SMP load-balancer needs
time to gain precision in the non-RT test - so i'd suggest to test it
much longer than 10 seconds: 300 seconds at least.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
