On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 04:57:52AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > echo 1 > /sys/module/scsi_mod/.../wait_for_async_scans > > somewhere in some script. In fact, the latter method seems simpler, > saner, better (in every which way)! Please don't force sysfs on people. Just watch how it keels over and dies when you end up with lots of disks/network interfaces on reasonably sized boxes. 16 statically allocated files per network interface starts being a problem once you've got a few thousand interfaces. Anything that forces me to use sysfs is not gonna fly. -ben -- "Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important." Don't Email: <[email protected]>. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- References:
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: "Simon Arlott" <[email protected]>
- Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Simon Arlott <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ALPHA: MARVEL - check for allocated memory
- Previous by thread: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Next by thread: Re: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Index(es):
 |