Satyam Sharma wrote:
> >semantics of it (read-only? read-write? write-only?Well, it _has_ to be write, don't really care if it's read-write or write-only. I would still prefer read-write, but we can go ahead with write-only too. It doesn't really matter, does it?
just to be devils advocate... it should be a read that returns when done, and that can be polled - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- References:
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: "Simon Arlott" <[email protected]>
- Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Simon Arlott <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- Prev by Date: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Next by Date: Re: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- Previous by thread: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Next by thread: Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
- Index(es):