On Di, 15.05.07 12:53 Thomas Kuther wrote: > Hi! > > Since 2.6.21 I have a problem with the it821x driver on my ITE 8212 > controller. > Now I saw some updates to it821x in 2.6.22-rc1 and gave that a try, > but the problem persists. > Back on 2.6.20 - here is some output from the working driver. There is actually no difference in dmesg: -------------------------8<--------------------------- IT8212: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:00:09.0 ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:09.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 IT8212: chipset revision 17 it821x: controller in smart mode. IT8212: 100% native mode on irq 18 ide2: BM-DMA at 0xdc00-0xdc07, BIOS settings: hde:pio, hdf:pio ide3: BM-DMA at 0xdc08-0xdc0f, BIOS settings: hdg:pio, hdh:pio Probing IDE interface ide2... hde: SAMSUNG SP2514N, ATA DISK drive hdf: Maxtor 6Y120L0, ATA DISK drive hde: Performing identify fixups. hdf: Performing identify fixups. ide2 at 0xec00-0xec07,0xe802 on irq 18 hde: max request size: 128KiB hde: 488397168 sectors (250059 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=30401/255/63, BUG DMA OFF hde:hde: recal_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } hde:recal_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError } ide: failed opcode was: unknown hde1 hdf: max request size: 128KiB hdf: 240121728 sectors (122942 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=65535/16/63, BUG DMA OFF hdf:hdf: recal_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } hdf:recal_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError } ide: failed opcode was: unknown hdf1 ------------------------------>8------------------------------- But hdparm works: --------------- # hdparm -d1 /dev/hde /dev/hde: setting using_dma to 1 (on) using_dma = 1 (on) ---------------- # hdparm -tT /dev/hde /dev/hde: Timing cached reads: 372 MB in 2.01 seconds = 185.17 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Input/output error Timing buffered disk reads: 124 MB in 3.01 seconds = 41.18 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Input/output error ---------------- hdparm version is 7.3. DMA is enabled in the controller's BIOS, of course. Hope this helps a bit. Thanks, Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- IT821x: no DMA since 2.6.21
- From: Thomas Kuther <[email protected]>
- IT821x: no DMA since 2.6.21
- Prev by Date: Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- Next by Date: Re: IT821x: no DMA since 2.6.21
- Previous by thread: IT821x: no DMA since 2.6.21
- Next by thread: Re: IT821x: no DMA since 2.6.21
- Index(es):