On Monday 14 May 2007 21:03, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > No, I'm proposing this for 2.6.22-rc1 ... Andi has already said he won't
> > push the smp consolidation patch for 2.6.22.
> >
> > Without this patch, voyager won't even build, since the smp_ops broke
> > it, so it needs to be fixed *now*.
>
> Sure, I suppose. But given that the patch which fixes this is a simple
> no-functional-changes code-motion patch, it seems odd to not use it in
> favour of putting in a big chunk of duplicated code.
Ok. If it's just the code movement patch that's needed perhaps it's better
to use that.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
