Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops

On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:10:48 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> wrote:

> James Bottomley wrote:
> > From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
> >
> > This adds an smp_ops for voyager, and hooks things up appropriately.
> > This is the first baby-step to making subarch runtime switchable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
> >
> > Rediffed to work in the absence of the smp consolidation patch
> >   
> 
> I think Andrew is carrying that in -mm.  If you're proposing this for
> git, then we may as well pull in that patch too.
> 

Does "that" have name?  I can find no patch in -mm which appears to have
anything to do with SMP consolidation, and this patch applies cleanly to
the current -mm lineup.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

References:
- [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
  - From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] leds:arch/sh/boards/landisk LEDs supports
Next by Date: Re: How to access correctly serial port inside module?
Previous by thread: Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
Next by thread: Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]