Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data

Christoph,

you know I've got a question (may be it's stupid) - what a
sense to discard UDF_I_* macroses? I mean as I see they
don't slow down execution of the code...

		Cyrill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data
    • From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data
    • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data
    • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Freezer: Read PF_BORROWED_MM in a nonracy way
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]