On Sat, 12 May 2007 11:18:09 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It's peculiar that the hang happens when acpi_evaluate_object() hits its
> > return statement. Any theories there?
>
> Only stack or memory corruption come into mind, but I have no clue how
> this is related to the resume logic changes.
So I had the brilliant idea of turning on some kernel debugging. It's
a shame that CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND disables CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC.
[ 73.533454] swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps created
[ 73.550429] Stopping tasks ... BUG: at kernel/lockdep.c:2414 check_flags()
[ 73.550988] [<c0104c14>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
[ 73.551143] [<c0105769>] show_trace+0x12/0x14
[ 73.551279] [<c01057c1>] dump_stack+0x15/0x17
[ 73.551412] [<c0132732>] check_flags+0x93/0x13d
[ 73.551554] [<c0135558>] lock_acquire+0x28/0x7f
[ 73.551691] [<c0310e35>] _spin_lock+0x2b/0x38
[ 73.551827] [<c013dc43>] refrigerator+0x16/0xc7
[ 73.551965] [<c0125d2e>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x32/0x387
[ 73.552124] [<c010336d>] do_notify_resume+0x91/0x6a9
[ 73.552271] [<c0103df1>] work_notifysig+0x13/0x1a
[ 73.552413] =======================
[ 73.552507] irq event stamp: 3075
[ 73.552595] hardirqs last enabled at (3075): [<c0103e51>] syscall_exit_work+0x11/0x26
[ 73.552821] hardirqs last disabled at (3074): [<c0103d35>] syscall_exit+0x9/0x1a
[ 73.553046] softirqs last enabled at (2778): [<c01209f2>] __do_softirq+0x92/0x9a
[ 73.553255] softirqs last disabled at (2693): [<c0120a27>] do_softirq+0x2d/0x46
[ 73.559504] done.
[ 73.559569] Shrinking memory... -done (0 pages freed)
[ 73.646511] Freed 0 kbytes in 0.08 seconds (0.00 MB/s)
[ 73.649595] platform sonypi: freeze
[ 73.649707] platform bluetooth: freeze
[ 73.649817] usb_endpoint usbdev5.1_ep81: PM: suspend 0->1, parent 5-0:1.0 already 2
[ 73.650023] hub 5-0:1.0: PM: suspend 2-->1
<snippage>
[ 73.739499] ipw2200 0000:06:0b.0: freeze
[ 73.743860] eth1: Going into suspend...
[ 73.748444] e100 0000:06:08.0: freeze
at this point I lost netconsole (earlier testing was without netconsole
btw)
The lockdep spew is coming out of here:
static void check_flags(unsigned long flags)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP) && defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS)
if (!debug_locks)
return;
if (irqs_disabled_flags(flags))
--> DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled);
else
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!current->hardirqs_enabled);
and the callsite is:
void refrigerator(void)
{
/* Hmm, should we be allowed to suspend when there are realtime
processes around? */
long save;
--> task_lock(current);
if (freezing(current)) {
frozen_process();
task_unlock(current);
} else {
I don't really know what lockdep is complaining about there. I assume I'm
not supposed to, given that whoever wrote that couldn't be bothered
documenting any of it.
I _think_ it means that lockdep believes that local irqs are enabled
(according to its state tracking), only it turns out that they're not.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
