Re: x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review

Kevin Winchester wrote:
> Not sure if you were looking for testing, but I fuzzed it to apply to
> 2.6.21-git and gave it a spin.  Worked just like a normal boot (which I
> assume was the point).

That would be the point, yes :)  Looking for breakage in video mode
detection, memory detection, and APM are probably the trickiest areas.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review
  - From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review
  - From: Kevin Winchester <[email protected]>

References:
- x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review
  - From: Kevin Winchester <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/2] From: Paul Mundt <[email protected]>
Next by Date: Re: SLUB under lguest on i386
Previous by thread: Re: x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review
Next by thread: Re: x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]