On Fri, 11 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> However I think we've done enough slab work for 2.6.22 now so I'm inclined
> to queue these changes for 2.6.23. That would mean that the slab changes in
> -mm have a dependency on the sh git tree which I am sure to forget about.
> If I end up merging these changes before Paul merges his tree, sh will
> break. Presumably Paul will notice this ;)
Ok. Only mm is fine for what I have planned. I want to add a
kmem_cache_ops structure for 2.6.23. Maybe I can use the now useless dtor
field of kmem_cache_create for this?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
