Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>>
>>> turns up no less than 1106+2 hits.
>> You forgot to exclude instances with "asm" in them.
> 
> You can do that.
> 

I can.  54.2% of those hits were "asm", and therefore require the
"register" keyword.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
    • From: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 05/10] Linux Kernel Markers - i386 optimized version
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]