Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>>
>>> turns up no less than 1106+2 hits.
>> You forgot to exclude instances with "asm" in them.
> 
> You can do that.
> 

I can.  54.2% of those hits were "asm", and therefore require the
"register" keyword.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
  - From: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
Next by Date: Re: [patch 05/10] Linux Kernel Markers - i386 optimized version
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]