Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2

On May 10 2007 14:45, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On May 10 2007 14:20, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>>> Who knew a documentation patch would get so many reviews?  I like it...
>> 
>> And the next thing is register-considered-harmful.txt. Running
>> 
>> 	grep -Pr '\bregister\s+(unsigned|char|short|int|long|float|
>> 	double|struct|union|uint|u\d+|s\d+)\b' linux-2.6.21/ | wc -l
>> 
>> turns up no less than 1106+2 hits.
>
>You forgot to exclude instances with "asm" in them.

You can do that.


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
    • From: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/s390/
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]