On 5/11/07, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:18:25PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Also notice that current cpus were not designed to work 300 years.
> > > When we have hw designed for 50 years+, we can start to worry.
On a related note, older technology is less sensible. My old VAX VLC4000
from 1991 which received a small heatsink in exchange for its noisy fans
is still doing well in an closed place. I'm more worried for the EPROMs
which store the boot code. Also, I think that the RS6000 processed at
half-micron which run the Mars rovers might run for hundreds of years
at 30 MHz.
Not your typical RS/6000. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAD6000
Without a doubt, decently built computers will easily last at least 10
years. From what I can tell, the issue here was simply OS runtime?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]