On 5/8/07, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
And has Ulrich indicated that glibc would indeed go out ahead of
the kernel in this fashion?
Rik is concerned to get a glibc version which allows him to test the
improvements. That's really not a big problem. We laready have a
patch for this and can provide appropriate RPMs easily.
I don't want to set a precedence for adding glibc support for phantom
features. So, I would not add support to the official glibc anyway
until there is a fixed implementation which then also means a fixed
ABI. So, Andrew, applying the patch won't do any good.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
