Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil

Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here are some 'volatile' comments from Linus, extracted from
> several emails in at least 2 threads.
> 
> If this is close to useful, we can add it to Documentation/.

I just took a shot at turning this into something more like a normal
document:

	http://lwn.net/Articles/233479/

Comments welcome.  If people think it suits the need I'll happily make a
version which moves from the LWN style to Documentation/ and send it in.

Thanks,

jon

Jonathan Corbet / LWN.net / [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil
    • From: Johannes Stezenbach <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: + fix-spellings-of-slab-allocator-section-in-init-kconfig.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by Date: Re: + fix-spellings-of-slab-allocator-section-in-init-kconfig.patch added to -mm tree
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]