On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:19:46AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >On Tue, 8 May 2007, Russell King wrote:
> >
> >>Shall I invent __CPUINIT to mark data to always be thrown away, or are
> >>the x86 folk going to withdraw this patch and do it properly?
> >>
> >
> >I can certainly revert the patch, but it would probably be better if you
> >were to just start adding the infrastructure you need and send it as a new
> >patch instead (where the revert is part of it, and the __CPUINIT is
> >additional).
>
> I've sent Russell a new patch to test off-list. He or I will submit a
> fix here after he tests.
I'm not sure it'd make much sense for me to test it - I don't have x86
based test boxes here.
Assuming your intention is to revert this commit and replace it with your
patch which doesn't change the semantics of __INIT, it shouldn't cause me
any problems.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
